Data Protection Overview
TrustOriginality.ai publishes legal and privacy materials that help customers understand what data may be processed, what controls may apply and where additional review is needed.
Data protection controls and boundaries
Data categories, retention and customer control posture
This page explains the public data-protection posture of TrustOriginality.ai, including data categories, retention expectations and request-based review paths.
Subprocessor and residency note
Where infrastructure, residency or processing detail depends on deployment, the public page stays high level and points buyers to request-based review.
What Data Is Processed
The exact data processed depends on the verification workflow, such as uploaded content, account details, metadata and generated reports.
Uploaded Content
Uploaded files or submitted text may be processed to run the requested verification workflow and generate review outputs.
Metadata
Metadata may include operational or provenance-related details needed to support the verification, reporting or auditability workflow.
Verification Results
Verification results may include scores, findings, provenance indicators or other review outputs tied to the submitted content.
Reports
Reports may capture evidence-oriented outputs such as signed PDF records or related verification summaries for internal review.
User Account Data
Account and contact data may be processed to support access, administration, billing, support and enterprise communication flows.
Data Retention
Retention depends on the workflow, legal materials and enterprise agreement. Buyers should review the public retention documentation and request clarifications where needed.
Data Deletion
Deletion handling should be coordinated through privacy and legal request paths, subject to the workflow context and applicable obligations.
Data Access
Access to customer-submitted material should be limited according to the operational and contractual model in use.
Data Residency
Data residency expectations should be evaluated against the selected deployment model and enterprise requirements rather than assumed from a generic claim.
Subprocessors
Subprocessor information is available through the public legal surface and additional review channels where applicable. If further detail is needed, request it during procurement.
Customer Control
Enterprise customers should define approval, retention, deletion and access expectations in line with their governance and contracting requirements.
AI overview and procurement Q&A
These short answers are written for enterprise buyers, compliance teams and LLM-assisted discovery workflows.
No. It stays at the level of public documentation and points enterprise buyers to request-specific review where more detail is needed.
Not necessarily. Where the repository does not expose a full list, the page directs buyers to request-based disclosure paths.
No. Residency expectations should be validated against the actual deployment and enterprise agreement.
